What It Does
Hold servers, images and containers to a declared baseline, and treat drift from it as a finding.
Observable indicator. Baseline drift is detected on a stated cadence and dispositioned.
Where It Sits
A technique is chosen from inside a form and emplaced on one layer. Both are the catalog’s own declarations; the position is counted in catalog order.
- Form of maneuverM2 Defense in DepthEnsure no single failure is decisive.
- Terrain layerT2 DevicesThe entry fords. Key terrain: Mission-staff laptops, contractor devices, the server and VM fleet.
- Position in the form11 of 18M2 carries 18 cataloged techniques; this is the 11th in catalog order.
Phases It Is Employed In
Employed in one phase of the campaign. A phase named here means at least this technique is live in it — not that the form it belongs to is the main effort.
- Phase 0ShapeContinuous terrain preparation, zero-trust hardening, partnerships, threat intelligence.
Controls That Assess It
The controls the catalog names against this technique. They are what an assessor would test to establish that it is emplaced and working — the indicator above is what shows it is working, which is a different question.
- TM-6 Terrain CurrencyTerrain Management — To keep the overlay current against both the clock and the change, so that planning is conducted against ground as it currently is.
- CG-4 Findings DispositionCommand and Governance — To ensure every finding reaches a decision, so that the open set reflects work in progress rather than accumulated neglect.
- DV-4 Execution ControlDevices Terrain — To deny the adversary the ability to run code on the ground they cross into, which is the cheapest point at which most engagements can be stopped.
In MITRE D3FEND
What this technique is called in MITRE’s countermeasure ontology. The join runs technique-to-technique: D3FEND catalogs countermeasures, and the thing with a countermeasure’s shape here is the technique, not the control.
- D3-AH Application HardeningHarden tactic
- D3-ACH Application Configuration HardeningHarden tactic
- D3-PH Platform HardeningHarden tactic
- D3-SCP System Configuration PermissionsHarden tactic
- D3-SCF System Call FilteringIsolate tactic
That a technique reaches a D3FEND countermeasure says the two describe the same defensive act. It does not say the countermeasure is deployed, configured, or working — that is an assessment finding about your estate, not a property of the framework.
Related Techniques
The catalog declares no relation for this entry, and no other entry names it — the inverse is derived here, so an incoming edge would show up even though this one never declared it. The techniques below share its assessment surface, which is the nearest adjacency the data supports.
Assessed Alongside
Not a declared relation: these are the techniques whose assessing controls overlap this one’s, ranked by how much of the two assessment surfaces coincide. Showing 6 of 16 that share at least one control.
- 1 shared controlM1.07 Partner and Advisory IntakeM1 Screen / Guard · TX Cross-Cutting
- CG-4
- 1 shared controlM3.08 Identity Lifecycle EnforcementM3 Envelopment · T1 Identity
- TM-6
- 1 shared controlM3.14 Entitlement RecertificationM3 Envelopment · T1 Identity
- CG-4
- 1 shared controlM7.15 Insider Risk InvestigationM7 Counterattack · T7 Workforce
- CG-4
- 1 shared controlM9.02 Targeted Emergency PatchingM9 Spoiling Attack · T4 Applications and Workloads
- CG-4
- 1 shared controlM9.07 Exploited-Vulnerability Catalog EnforcementM9 Spoiling Attack · T4 Applications and Workloads
- CG-4