Ten Nouns, Three Kinds.
A tower is not a terrain layer. A tier is neither. An asset is not the ground it stands on, and a form of maneuver is not a technique. These are the framework’s ten object classes, and confusing two of them is the fastest way to produce an overlay that looks correct and scores nothing — so each entry below leads with the question its class answers, and names the class it is most often mistaken for.
One Is a Rule You Inherit. the Other Is a Fact About Your Own Ground.
One framework, one version, one platform. The distinction that matters is not where a page is served from — it is whether you are reading a rule you inherit or filling in a fact about your own ground. Every object class below is sorted by that question, and towers are on the seam because they are where the two meet.
The reference manual
identical at every agency — read it, cite it, be assessed against it
Ten terrain layers, eleven forms of maneuver, 154 techniques and the full treatment of all 78 controls. Nobody adopts this half. It is the fixed rule two agencies can be compared against, and an assessment means nothing if each side brought its own copy.
The applied surface
different at every agency — the half that produces a score
Your assets, your tiers, your missions, and the towers where they roll up through the framework’s layers. The Diagram Studio, the clearing drill and the worked example all operate here. Nothing in this half is prescribed, and everything in it is measured.
Where the two meet is a tower: your assets rolling up through the framework’s layers, which is the only place coverage becomes a number.
Two Sentences Hold the Whole Model.
Ten definitions do not tell you how the ten relate. These do. Everything else on this page is one of these nouns, expanded.
A green edge marks a class you author; a heavy edge marks the one on the seam; a plain edge is fixed by the framework. Read the two sentences together and the claim is visible in one line: the second is the same for every agency in the country, and the first is yours.
Each with the Question It Answers, and Its Impostor.
The last field is the one that earns the table. Most misuse here is not ignorance of a term — it is confident substitution of a near neighbor that behaves differently.
The same for every agency in the country. You do not author these — you read them, cite them, and are assessed against them.
Terrain layer
10 layersWhat kind of ground is this?
The ten kinds of ground a federal estate is defended on — identity, devices, networks, applications, data, operational technology, workforce, facilities, supply chain, and the cross-cutting layer. Five are the CISA zero-trust pillars carried verbatim; four are ASOM-Fed’s own.
Form of maneuver
11 formsWhat am I going to do?
The eleven durable moves a defender can make. A form names an intent — deny movement, trade space for information, hand the ground back deliberately — at the level a commander can direct without knowing which product implements it.
Technique
154 techniquesHow, exactly, on this ground?
One form of maneuver realized on one terrain layer, with a falsifiable indicator. The ID names its parent form, so M5.03 is the third cataloged way to perform M5 Ambush.
Control
78 controls · 14 familiesWhat will an assessor test?
The assessable requirement — statement, activities, one accountable role, the evidence it produces and the procedure an assessor follows. Each inherits from NIST SP 800-53 and maps onto CSF 2.0.
Posture
4 posturesDoes it still hold when nobody is watching?
Whether a control keeps working unattended. It is an axis across the whole catalog rather than a group of controls, so every control has one.
Campaign phase
6 phasesWhere are we in the campaign?
Six phases, each with a declared main effort and stated conditions for moving to the next. Declaring one is what makes a scheme of maneuver a plan rather than a list of capabilities.
Different at every agency. These are authored, not consulted — you draw them, weight them, and they are what makes a score yours rather than the archetype’s.
Asset
Per estateWhat do I actually own?
The concrete things on your estate — a directory, a boundary device, a records store. Each lands on exactly one terrain layer, sits inside one tier, carries a weight, and serves at least one mission.
Tier
Per estateWhere does this sit on my diagram?
The bands you draw across your own overlay to separate exposure from consequence. They belong to one estate’s architecture, and a differently shaped agency may reasonably draw different ones.
Mission
Per estateWhy is any of this defended?
The service the agency exists to deliver. Every asset serves one, and the Bill of Defense states — per mission — what protects it, how much coverage rolls up, and what risk is left over.
One class sits on the seam. It is the framework’s map used as an accounting bucket for your estate’s assets, which is the moment coverage stops being a diagram and becomes a number.
Tower
10 towersHow much cover does this ground carry?
The same ten layers used as accounting buckets. Coverage and residual risk roll up through a tower to the missions that consume it, the way a cost-transparency model rolls spend up from a pool to a consumer.
Where Each of These Is Defined at Depth.
This page separates the classes. The glossary defines the terms used inside them — key terrain, main effort, decisive point, avenue of approach — with the same impostor treatment.