What It Does
Be able to cut a supplier's access immediately and continue the mission, because the alternative is negotiating with an intrusion.
Observable indicator. A supplier can be severed within a stated period without halting the mission.
Where It Sits
A technique is chosen from inside a form and emplaced on one layer. Both are the catalog’s own declarations; the position is counted in catalog order.
- Form of maneuverM8 Isolation / RetrogradeGive ground deliberately to preserve the force. Degrade gracefully; never fail open.
- Terrain layerT9 Supply ChainThe lines of communication. Key terrain: Suppliers with production access, component provenance, the update path into the estate.
- Position in the form16 of 17M8 carries 17 cataloged techniques; this is the 16th in catalog order.
Phases It Is Employed In
Employed in 2 of the campaign’s six phases. A phase named here means at least this technique is live in it — not that the form it belongs to is the main effort.
Controls That Assess It
The controls the catalog names against this technique. They are what an assessor would test to establish that it is emplaced and working — the indicator above is what shows it is working, which is a different question.
- LC-5 Supplier Severance CapabilityLines of Communication — To retain the option of cutting a line of communication, so that a compromised or failed supplier is a decision rather than a dependency.
- SM-5 Branches and SequelsScheme of Maneuver — To decide contingency responses before contact, so that the decision loop under pressure is a selection rather than a design exercise.
In MITRE D3FEND
What this technique is called in MITRE’s countermeasure ontology. The join runs technique-to-technique: D3FEND catalogs countermeasures, and the thing with a countermeasure’s shape here is the technique, not the control.
- D3-NAM Network Access MediationIsolate tactic
- D3-CR Credential RevocationEvict tactic
That a technique reaches a D3FEND countermeasure says the two describe the same defensive act. It does not say the countermeasure is deployed, configured, or working — that is an assessment finding about your estate, not a property of the framework.
Related Techniques
The catalog declares no relation for this entry, and no other entry names it — the inverse is derived here, so an incoming edge would show up even though this one never declared it. The techniques below share its assessment surface, which is the nearest adjacency the data supports.
Assessed Alongside
Not a declared relation: these are the techniques whose assessing controls overlap this one’s, ranked by how much of the two assessment surfaces coincide. Showing 6 of 11 that share at least one control.
- 1 shared controlM11.10 Supplier-Independent RebuildM11 Reconstitution · T9 Supply Chain
- LC-5
- 1 shared controlM2.13 Backup Isolation and ImmutabilityM2 Defense in Depth · T5 Data
- SM-5
- 1 shared controlM7.05 Credential Reset SweepM7 Counterattack · T1 Identity
- SM-5
- 1 shared controlM8.03 Read-Only Service DegradationM8 Isolation / Retrograde · T4 Applications and Workloads
- SM-5
- 1 shared controlM7.03 Automated Containment PlaybooksM7 Counterattack · TX Cross-Cutting
- SM-5
- 1 shared controlM7.11 Eviction SequencingM7 Counterattack · TX Cross-Cutting
- SM-5