What It Does
Be able to sever a building or floor from the estate without severing the mission, and know in advance what that costs.
Observable indicator. A facility can be isolated on a rehearsed procedure without an unplanned outage.
Where It Sits
A technique is chosen from inside a form and emplaced on one layer. Both are the catalog’s own declarations; the position is counted in catalog order.
- Form of maneuverM8 Isolation / RetrogradeGive ground deliberately to preserve the force. Degrade gracefully; never fail open.
- Terrain layerT8 FacilitiesThe physical boundary. Key terrain: Data center and wiring closet boundaries, public-access areas, maintenance routes.
- Position in the form15 of 17M8 carries 17 cataloged techniques; this is the 15th in catalog order.
Phases It Is Employed In
Employed in one phase of the campaign. A phase named here means at least this technique is live in it — not that the form it belongs to is the main effort.
- Phase IIIDominateHunt, contain, evict.
Controls That Assess It
The controls the catalog names against this technique. They are what an assessor would test to establish that it is emplaced and working — the indicator above is what shows it is working, which is a different question.
- FC-2 Physical Zone BoundaryFacilities Terrain — To establish physical boundaries that constrain movement and produce a record of crossing, so that physical terrain can be defended in depth rather than at a perimeter.
- FC-4 Environmental ContinuityFacilities Terrain — To know how long the physical ground holds without support, so that recovery objectives are not contradicted by the buildings the services sit in.
- SM-5 Branches and SequelsScheme of Maneuver — To decide contingency responses before contact, so that the decision loop under pressure is a selection rather than a design exercise.
In MITRE D3FEND
What this technique is called in MITRE’s countermeasure ontology. The join runs technique-to-technique: D3FEND catalogs countermeasures, and the thing with a countermeasure’s shape here is the technique, not the control.
- D3-PAM Physical Access MediationIsolate tactic
- D3-EPL Physical LockingIsolate tactic
That a technique reaches a D3FEND countermeasure says the two describe the same defensive act. It does not say the countermeasure is deployed, configured, or working — that is an assessment finding about your estate, not a property of the framework.
Related Techniques
The catalog declares no relation for this entry, and no other entry names it — the inverse is derived here, so an incoming edge would show up even though this one never declared it. The techniques below share its assessment surface, which is the nearest adjacency the data supports.
Assessed Alongside
Not a declared relation: these are the techniques whose assessing controls overlap this one’s, ranked by how much of the two assessment surfaces coincide. Showing 6 of 14 that share at least one control.
- 1 shared controlM2.13 Backup Isolation and ImmutabilityM2 Defense in Depth · T5 Data
- SM-5
- 1 shared controlM2.17 Facility Defense in DepthM2 Defense in Depth · T8 Facilities
- FC-2
- 1 shared controlM4.15 Physical Zone SegregationM4 Obstacle / Canalization · T8 Facilities
- FC-2
- 1 shared controlM7.05 Credential Reset SweepM7 Counterattack · T1 Identity
- SM-5
- 1 shared controlM8.03 Read-Only Service DegradationM8 Isolation / Retrograde · T4 Applications and Workloads
- SM-5
- 1 shared controlM8.16 Supplier SeveranceM8 Isolation / Retrograde · T9 Supply Chain
- SM-5