What It Does
Hunt for deviation in the physical process itself, not only in the network, because a competent adversary will look correct on the wire.
Observable indicator. Process behavior outside its engineering envelope is investigated as a security event.
Where It Sits
A technique is chosen from inside a form and emplaced on one layer. Both are the catalog’s own declarations; the position is counted in catalog order.
- Form of maneuverM7 CounterattackSeize the initiative and evict before the adversary reaches the objective.
- Terrain layerT6 Operational TechnologyGround you cannot maneuver freely on. Key terrain: Building control systems, laboratory and facility instrumentation, engineering workstations.
- Position in the form14 of 17M7 carries 17 cataloged techniques; this is the 14th in catalog order.
Phases It Is Employed In
Employed in 2 of the campaign’s six phases. A phase named here means at least this technique is live in it — not that the form it belongs to is the main effort.
- Phase IISeize InitiativeDetect early, canalize movement, and buy decision time.
- Phase IIIDominateHunt, contain, evict.
Controls That Assess It
The controls the catalog names against this technique. They are what an assessor would test to establish that it is emplaced and working — the indicator above is what shows it is working, which is a different question.
- CE-2 Priority Intelligence RequirementsCycle Execution and Assurance — To direct analytic effort at named questions, so that collection and hunting answer what the accountable authority needs rather than processing what arrives.
- FO-4 Operational Technology TerrainFederal Obligations — To stop operational technology being scored as though it were a server estate, and to make the connections between the two declarable.
In MITRE D3FEND
What this technique is called in MITRE’s countermeasure ontology. The join runs technique-to-technique: D3FEND catalogs countermeasures, and the thing with a countermeasure’s shape here is the technique, not the control.
- D3-OMM Operating Mode MonitoringDetect tactic
- D3-OPM Operational Process MonitoringDetect tactic
- D3-PUM Platform Uptime MonitoringDetect tactic
That a technique reaches a D3FEND countermeasure says the two describe the same defensive act. It does not say the countermeasure is deployed, configured, or working — that is an assessment finding about your estate, not a property of the framework.
Related Techniques
The catalog declares no relation for this entry, and no other entry names it — the inverse is derived here, so an incoming edge would show up even though this one never declared it. The techniques below share its assessment surface, which is the nearest adjacency the data supports.
Assessed Alongside
Not a declared relation: these are the techniques whose assessing controls overlap this one’s, ranked by how much of the two assessment surfaces coincide. Showing 6 of 33 that share at least one control.
- 2 shared controlsM5.11 Control Network DeceptionM5 Ambush · T6 Operational Technology
- CE-2
- FO-4
- 1 shared controlM1.04 Perimeter Canary TokensM1 Screen / Guard · T5 Data
- CE-2
- 1 shared controlM1.05 Authentication Geography BaselineM1 Screen / Guard · T1 Identity
- CE-2
- 1 shared controlM1.06 Credential Exposure MonitoringM1 Screen / Guard · T1 Identity
- CE-2
- 1 shared controlM1.07 Partner and Advisory IntakeM1 Screen / Guard · TX Cross-Cutting
- CE-2
- 1 shared controlM1.10 Named-Campaign Indicator WatchM1 Screen / Guard · TX Cross-Cutting
- CE-2