What It Does
Fold what was learned back into the maneuver catalog, the control set and the rules of engagement.
Observable indicator. Each engagement changes the doctrine that governs the next.
Where It Sits
A technique is chosen from inside a form and emplaced on one layer. Both are the catalog’s own declarations; the position is counted in catalog order.
- Form of maneuverM10 Exploitation & PursuitConvert contact into durable advantage rather than closing the ticket.
- Terrain layerTX Cross-CuttingThe enablers of movement. Key terrain: The telemetry pipeline, the orchestration layer, the rules of engagement.
- Position in the form6 of 7M10 carries 7 cataloged techniques; this is the 6th in catalog order.
Phases It Is Employed In
Employed in one phase of the campaign. A phase named here means at least this technique is live in it — not that the form it belongs to is the main effort.
- Phase VEnable / RestoreRecover, harden, and update the doctrine and the intelligence requirements.
Controls That Assess It
The controls the catalog names against this technique. They are what an assessor would test to establish that it is emplaced and working — the indicator above is what shows it is working, which is a different question.
- SM-1 Maneuver Catalog AdoptionScheme of Maneuver — To fix a shared vocabulary of defensive moves stated as intent, so the plan survives replacement of the tools that implement it.
- CG-3 Rules of EngagementCommand and Governance — To let operators act inside a known mandate rather than guessing at one, and to make the boundaries of that mandate legally and operationally sound.
In MITRE D3FEND
Doctrine and Catalog Update — a framework maintenance activity.
Related Techniques
The catalog declares no relation for this entry, and no other entry names it — the inverse is derived here, so an incoming edge would show up even though this one never declared it. The techniques below share its assessment surface, which is the nearest adjacency the data supports.
Assessed Alongside
Not a declared relation: these are the techniques whose assessing controls overlap this one’s, ranked by how much of the two assessment surfaces coincide. Showing 5 of 5 that share at least one control.
- 1 shared controlM3.15 Break-Glass Account ControlM3 Envelopment · T1 Identity
- CG-3
- 1 shared controlM4.10 Bastion and Jump-Host EnforcementM4 Obstacle / Canalization · T3 Networks
- CG-3
- 1 shared controlM8.04 Fail-Secure Default PostureM8 Isolation / Retrograde · TX Cross-Cutting
- CG-3
- 1 shared controlM8.08 Statutory Availability FloorM8 Isolation / Retrograde · TX Cross-Cutting
- CG-3
- 1 shared controlM6.05 Approval Gates on High-Impact ActionsM6 Delay · TX Cross-Cutting
- CG-3