What It Does
Report to CISA and sector partners so the next agency starts from your contact.
Observable indicator. Findings are shared within the stated reporting window.
Where It Sits
A technique is chosen from inside a form and emplaced on one layer. Both are the catalog’s own declarations; the position is counted in catalog order.
- Form of maneuverM10 Exploitation & PursuitConvert contact into durable advantage rather than closing the ticket.
- Terrain layerTX Cross-CuttingThe enablers of movement. Key terrain: The telemetry pipeline, the orchestration layer, the rules of engagement.
- Position in the form5 of 7M10 carries 7 cataloged techniques; this is the 5th in catalog order.
Phases It Is Employed In
Employed in one phase of the campaign. A phase named here means at least this technique is live in it — not that the form it belongs to is the main effort.
- Phase VEnable / RestoreRecover, harden, and update the doctrine and the intelligence requirements.
Controls That Assess It
The controls the catalog names against this technique. They are what an assessor would test to establish that it is emplaced and working — the indicator above is what shows it is working, which is a different question.
- CE-7 Brief Generation and DistributionCycle Execution and Assurance — To produce one document per cycle that an Authorizing Official can decide from, rather than a dashboard nobody decides from.
- CG-5 Control Inheritance MappingCommand and Governance — To keep the framework additive, so that adopting it adds assessment effort only where it adds assessable content.
- EN-6 Engagement CommunicationEngagement and Pursuit — To ensure the people who must know, do — inside the agency, across the federal community, and among those the mission serves.
In MITRE D3FEND
Community Reporting — an information-sharing obligation.
Related Techniques
The catalog declares no relation for this entry, and no other entry names it — the inverse is derived here, so an incoming edge would show up even though this one never declared it. The techniques below share its assessment surface, which is the nearest adjacency the data supports.
Assessed Alongside
Not a declared relation: these are the techniques whose assessing controls overlap this one’s, ranked by how much of the two assessment surfaces coincide. Showing 6 of 6 that share at least one control.
- 3 shared controlsM9.04 Sector Intelligence ExchangeM9 Spoiling Attack · TX Cross-Cutting
- CE-7
- CG-5
- EN-6
- 1 shared controlM1.09 Supply Chain and Vendor WatchM1 Screen / Guard · TX Cross-Cutting
- CG-5
- 1 shared controlM8.10 Third-Party Connection CutoutM8 Isolation / Retrograde · T3 Networks
- CG-5
- 1 shared controlM9.06 Vendor Compromise ResponseM9 Spoiling Attack · TX Cross-Cutting
- CG-5
- 1 shared controlM10.07 Supply Chain Lesson PropagationM10 Exploitation & Pursuit · T9 Supply Chain
- CG-5
- 1 shared controlM3.13 Federation Trust Boundary ControlM3 Envelopment · T1 Identity
- CG-5