What It Does
Block infrastructure named in partner reporting before it is used against you, on a stated clock.
Observable indicator. Named infrastructure is blocked within the intake window.
Where It Sits
A technique is chosen from inside a form and emplaced on one layer. Both are the catalog’s own declarations; the position is counted in catalog order.
- Form of maneuverM9 Spoiling AttackDisrupt adversary staging before the attack is launched.
- Terrain layerTX Cross-CuttingThe enablers of movement. Key terrain: The telemetry pipeline, the orchestration layer, the rules of engagement.
- Position in the form1 of 9M9 carries 9 cataloged techniques; this is the 1st in catalog order.
Phases It Is Employed In
Employed in 2 of the campaign’s six phases. A phase named here means at least this technique is live in it — not that the form it belongs to is the main effort.
Controls That Assess It
The controls the catalog names against this technique. They are what an assessor would test to establish that it is emplaced and working — the indicator above is what shows it is working, which is a different question.
- CE-2 Priority Intelligence RequirementsCycle Execution and Assurance — To direct analytic effort at named questions, so that collection and hunting answer what the accountable authority needs rather than processing what arrives.
- TA-4 Pre-authorized ResponseTempo and Temporal Advantage — To remove authority latency from the decision loop, so that the segment most programs cannot shorten with tooling is shortened by governance.
In MITRE D3FEND
What this technique is called in MITRE’s countermeasure ontology. The join runs technique-to-technique: D3FEND catalogs countermeasures, and the thing with a countermeasure’s shape here is the technique, not the control.
- D3-DNSDL DNS DenylistingIsolate tactic
- D3-FRDDL Forward Resolution Domain DenylistingIsolate tactic
- D3-FRIDL Forward Resolution IP DenylistingIsolate tactic
That a technique reaches a D3FEND countermeasure says the two describe the same defensive act. It does not say the countermeasure is deployed, configured, or working — that is an assessment finding about your estate, not a property of the framework.
Related Techniques
The catalog declares no relation for this entry, and no other entry names it — the inverse is derived here, so an incoming edge would show up even though this one never declared it. The techniques below share its assessment surface, which is the nearest adjacency the data supports.
Assessed Alongside
Not a declared relation: these are the techniques whose assessing controls overlap this one’s, ranked by how much of the two assessment surfaces coincide. Showing 6 of 43 that share at least one control.
- 2 shared controlsM1.06 Credential Exposure MonitoringM1 Screen / Guard · T1 Identity
- CE-2
- TA-4
- 2 shared controlsM9.05 Pre-Emptive Credential InvalidationM9 Spoiling Attack · T1 Identity
- CE-2
- TA-4
- 1 shared controlM1.04 Perimeter Canary TokensM1 Screen / Guard · T5 Data
- CE-2
- 1 shared controlM1.05 Authentication Geography BaselineM1 Screen / Guard · T1 Identity
- CE-2
- 1 shared controlM1.07 Partner and Advisory IntakeM1 Screen / Guard · TX Cross-Cutting
- CE-2
- 1 shared controlM1.10 Named-Campaign Indicator WatchM1 Screen / Guard · TX Cross-Cutting
- CE-2