What It Does
Encrypt decisive data with keys held outside the system that reads it, so storage compromise is not data compromise.
Observable indicator. Exfiltrating storage does not yield readable records.
Where It Sits
A technique is chosen from inside a form and emplaced on one layer. Both are the catalog’s own declarations; the position is counted in catalog order.
- Form of maneuverM2 Defense in DepthEnsure no single failure is decisive.
- Terrain layerT5 DataThe objective. Key terrain: Sensitive mission records, PII stores, fee and financial data.
- Position in the form9 of 18M2 carries 18 cataloged techniques; this is the 9th in catalog order.
Phases It Is Employed In
Employed in one phase of the campaign. A phase named here means at least this technique is live in it — not that the form it belongs to is the main effort.
- Phase 0ShapeContinuous terrain preparation, zero-trust hardening, partnerships, threat intelligence.
Controls That Assess It
The controls the catalog names against this technique. They are what an assessor would test to establish that it is emplaced and working — the indicator above is what shows it is working, which is a different question.
- KT-2 Decisive Point Protection FloorKey Terrain and Decisive Points — To ensure designation produces protection, so that identifying a decisive point is an act with consequences rather than an annotation.
- TM-3 Asset WeightingTerrain Management — To convert an undifferentiated inventory into a priority order, so that coverage figures carry meaning and investment can be argued from mission consequence.
- FO-2 Controlled Unclassified Information HandlingFederal Obligations — To make CUI movement declarable and therefore detectable, so that handling obligations attach to information rather than to systems.
In MITRE D3FEND
What this technique is called in MITRE’s countermeasure ontology. The join runs technique-to-technique: D3FEND catalogs countermeasures, and the thing with a countermeasure’s shape here is the technique, not the control.
- D3-DENCR Disk EncryptionHarden tactic
- D3-FE File EncryptionHarden tactic
That a technique reaches a D3FEND countermeasure says the two describe the same defensive act. It does not say the countermeasure is deployed, configured, or working — that is an assessment finding about your estate, not a property of the framework.
Related Techniques
The catalog declares no relation for this entry, and no other entry names it — the inverse is derived here, so an incoming edge would show up even though this one never declared it. The techniques below share its assessment surface, which is the nearest adjacency the data supports.
Assessed Alongside
Not a declared relation: these are the techniques whose assessing controls overlap this one’s, ranked by how much of the two assessment surfaces coincide. Showing 6 of 27 that share at least one control.
- 1 shared controlM11.02 Isolated Recovery EnvironmentM11 Reconstitution · T5 Data
- KT-2
- 1 shared controlM2.03 Crown-Jewel EnclaveM2 Defense in Depth · T5 Data
- KT-2
- 1 shared controlM2.04 Independent Control RedundancyM2 Defense in Depth · TX Cross-Cutting
- KT-2
- 1 shared controlM2.07 Web Application ProtectionM2 Defense in Depth · T4 Applications and Workloads
- KT-2
- 1 shared controlM2.08 API Authorization EnforcementM2 Defense in Depth · T4 Applications and Workloads
- KT-2
- 1 shared controlM2.10 Egress Data Loss PreventionM2 Defense in Depth · T5 Data
- KT-2