What It Does
Watch certificate transparency and registration feeds for lookalike domains and unsanctioned certificates issued in the agency name.
Observable indicator. Impersonation infrastructure is identified while it is still being staged.
Where It Sits
A technique is chosen from inside a form and emplaced on one layer. Both are the catalog’s own declarations; the position is counted in catalog order.
- Form of maneuverM1 Screen / GuardGain early warning and buy reaction time before the adversary touches key terrain.
- Terrain layerT3 NetworksThe corridors. Key terrain: TIC 3.0 access points, segment boundaries, cloud VPC peering.
- Position in the form3 of 15M1 carries 15 cataloged techniques; this is the 3rd in catalog order.
Phases It Is Employed In
Employed in 2 of the campaign’s six phases. A phase named here means at least this technique is live in it — not that the form it belongs to is the main effort.
Controls That Assess It
The controls the catalog names against this technique. They are what an assessor would test to establish that it is emplaced and working — the indicator above is what shows it is working, which is a different question.
- TM-1 Terrain Inventory and OverlayTerrain Management — To establish one authoritative positional picture of the estate, so that every later judgment about priority, reachability and risk is made against the same ground.
- KT-3 Avenue of Approach AnalysisKey Terrain and Decisive Points — To convert the estate's connectivity into a set of named approach routes, so that defense can be emplaced on the routes that exist rather than distributed evenly across ground.
In MITRE D3FEND
What this technique is called in MITRE’s countermeasure ontology. The join runs technique-to-technique: D3FEND catalogs countermeasures, and the thing with a countermeasure’s shape here is the technique, not the control.
- D3-HD Homoglyph DetectionDetect tactic
- D3-DNRA Domain Name Reputation AnalysisDetect tactic
- D3-ACA Active Certificate AnalysisDetect tactic
- D3-PCA Passive Certificate AnalysisDetect tactic
That a technique reaches a D3FEND countermeasure says the two describe the same defensive act. It does not say the countermeasure is deployed, configured, or working — that is an assessment finding about your estate, not a property of the framework.
Related Techniques
The catalog declares no relation for this entry, and no other entry names it — the inverse is derived here, so an incoming edge would show up even though this one never declared it. The techniques below share its assessment surface, which is the nearest adjacency the data supports.
Assessed Alongside
Not a declared relation: these are the techniques whose assessing controls overlap this one’s, ranked by how much of the two assessment surfaces coincide. Showing 6 of 9 that share at least one control.
- 2 shared controlsM1.01 External Attack Surface EnumerationM1 Screen / Guard · T3 Networks
- KT-3
- TM-1
- 1 shared controlM1.04 Perimeter Canary TokensM1 Screen / Guard · T5 Data
- KT-3
- 1 shared controlM9.03 Staged Infrastructure DenialM9 Spoiling Attack · T3 Networks
- KT-3
- 1 shared controlM1.11 Operational Technology Asset DiscoveryM1 Screen / Guard · T6 Operational Technology
- TM-1
- 1 shared controlM1.15 Device Estate DiscoveryM1 Screen / Guard · T2 Devices
- TM-1
- 1 shared controlM10.03 Terrain Overlay UpdateM10 Exploitation & Pursuit · TX Cross-Cutting
- TM-1