ASOM-Fedv6.1Open the explorer
ID-1 · Identity Terrain

Identity Plane Definition

Control Statement

The organization shall identify on the terrain overlay every authoritative identity plane, the policy decision and enforcement points it operates, and the trust relationships between planes.

Purpose. To make identity positional, so that the plane controlling movement everywhere else is itself defensible ground rather than an assumed service.

Discussion

Most estates have more than one identity plane and have never drawn the relationships between them: a primary provider, a legacy directory, a cloud tenant, one or more federated partners, and a set of local account stores that answer to nobody. Trust edges between planes are the highest-value terrain in the estate, because compromise of a low-assurance plane that a high-assurance plane trusts confers the higher assurance. That is the identity equivalent of an unmapped mobility corridor, and it is invisible on a network diagram.

Goals and Metrics

A metric that cannot come out badly is not a metric. Each of these is capable of reporting that the control is not working.

Every element of the estate has a recorded plane that authorizes access to it.
  • Percentage of estate elements whose authorizing plane is recorded
  • Number of elements reachable through a plane that is not on the overlay
The identity plane is held as ground, with its trust edges enumerated rather than assumed.
  • Count of identity planes and trust edges, trended
  • Number of enforcement points discovered that were absent from the register

Accountability

Exactly one role is accountable, and every other role carries at least Informed — no control in the published catalog leaves a role with zero relationship to it. That is a stated property of how these were authored, not a coincidence, and not a claim that every role's work is worth equal attention here.

AOCTISOCHUNTPLATISSO
Authorizing Official / CISO: AccountableCyber Threat Intelligence cell: ConsultedSOC / Defensive Operations: ConsultedHunt team: InformedPlatform and product owners: ResponsibleGovernance / RMF / ISSO: Informed

AO Authorizing Official / CISOCTI Cyber Threat Intelligence cellSOC SOC / Defensive OperationsHUNT Hunt teamPLAT Platform and product ownersISSO Governance / RMF / ISSO

  • AccountableAuthorizing Official / CISO
  • ConsultedCyber Threat Intelligence cell
  • ConsultedSOC / Defensive Operations
  • InformedHunt team
  • ResponsiblePlatform and product owners
  • InformedGovernance / RMF / ISSO

Inputs and Outputs

Consumes

Produces

Activities

  1. L2Identify every authoritative identity plane serving the estate and place it on the overlay.
  2. L2Record the policy decision and enforcement points each plane operates.
  3. L2Record which elements depend on which plane for authorization.
  4. L3Enumerate trust relationships between planes — federation, synchronisation, directory trust, token exchange — and record their direction and assurance.
  5. L3Identify local and non-federated account stores as identity planes in their own right rather than as exceptions, since an unmapped store is an unmapped plane.
  6. L3Designate the primary plane and any plane whose compromise would confer control of it as decisive points under KT-1.
  7. L3Record for each enforcement point whether it is consulted on every authorization decision or only at session establishment.
  8. L4Trend the count of identity planes and trust edges; growth is terrain expansion that no asset inventory reports.
  9. L4Test that enforcement points are actually consulted, rather than accepting the architecture's claim that they are.
  10. L5Consolidate planes and retire trust edges where the estate permits, since reducing the terrain is more durable than defending more of it.

Measurement

Outcome

Percentage of estate elements whose authorizing plane is recorded.

Performance

Count of identity planes and trust edges, trended.

Evidence and Assessment

Evidence expected

Overlay showing identity planes, enforcement points and trust edges; plane dependency record.

Assessment procedure

Examine the overlay against directory and federation configuration; test for local or non-federated stores absent from the plane list; test whether a sampled enforcement point is consulted on authorization.

Related Guidance

Inherits
  • IA-8
  • AC-3
  • PM-5
Satisfies
  • PR.AA-01
  • ID.AM-01

Position in the Chain

Derived from the other controls’ own declarations, so the two directions cannot disagree.

Where This Control Is Used

Derived, in every case, from the declaration at the other end: the forms whose techniques name this control, the artifacts whose producing and consuming controls include it, the layers whose control lists name it, and the roles its own accountability chart puts to work. Nothing here is authored on this page, so the sheet cannot claim an edge the other end does not.

Forms of Maneuver It Assesses

  • M3EnvelopmentMake identity, not network location, the decisive plane — surround the adversary with policy.3 of 20 techniques — M3.02, M3.13, M3.18
  • M11ReconstitutionRestore the mission on evidence, not on hope — and prove it before you need it.1 of 11 techniques — M11.04

Terrain It Is Named On

  • T1IdentityDraws the identity plane as ground: which planes exist, where their trust edges run, and which enforcement points stand on them. Every other control on this layer resolves against it.

Artifacts It Stands On

  • consumesCyber Terrain OverlayThe positional map of the estate: every element with a defensive layer, a defensive weight, a named accountable owner and its adjacencies. Not an asset inventory — an inventory enumerates, an overlay positions.

Roles It Puts to Work